<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Yes, Title Safe Still Matters &#8211; Especially for Online Video	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://eks.tv/title-safe-still-matters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://eks.tv/title-safe-still-matters/</link>
	<description>Erik Swanson - Filmmaker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 13:00:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Erik Swanson		</title>
		<link>https://eks.tv/title-safe-still-matters/#comment-588</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erik Swanson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 13:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://eks.tv/?p=2898#comment-588</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://eks.tv/title-safe-still-matters/#comment-587&quot;&gt;Thomas Happ&lt;/a&gt;.

Glad you found it helpful Tom!
It&#039;s also nice to know I&#039;m still the top search result after all these years]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://eks.tv/title-safe-still-matters/#comment-587">Thomas Happ</a>.</p>
<p>Glad you found it helpful Tom!<br />
It&#8217;s also nice to know I&#8217;m still the top search result after all these years</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Thomas Happ		</title>
		<link>https://eks.tv/title-safe-still-matters/#comment-587</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Happ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 18:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://eks.tv/?p=2898#comment-587</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Maybe it&#039;s just because I&#039;m related to you, but this is the first search result in google when I went to check if I was using the right title/action safe boundaries.  Pretty sweet!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s just because I&#8217;m related to you, but this is the first search result in google when I went to check if I was using the right title/action safe boundaries.  Pretty sweet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: like video		</title>
		<link>https://eks.tv/title-safe-still-matters/#comment-580</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[like video]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 03:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://eks.tv/?p=2898#comment-580</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This article is very practical, reminding us of various details to pay attention to in video production. Well done!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is very practical, reminding us of various details to pay attention to in video production. Well done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Erik Swanson		</title>
		<link>https://eks.tv/title-safe-still-matters/#comment-529</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erik Swanson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2023 11:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://eks.tv/?p=2898#comment-529</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://eks.tv/title-safe-still-matters/#comment-528&quot;&gt;Sergio Pol&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Sergio, You are correct that SD is much smaller than HD video - about 1/6 the resolution. If I am understanding what you&#039;re saying correctly, I think what you are seeing in photoshop is the difference in the number of pixels between SD and HD. 
The title safe areas are using the aspect ratio of the video formats, not the number of pixels. The HD (16x9) aspect ratio is 33% wider than the SD (12x9) aspect ratio. 
When HD video is played on an SD screen it isn&#039;t a perfect pixel to pixel translation - the video is scaled down to vertically fit the SD screen, so only a small amount of information on the left and right are cropped from 16x9 to 12x9 aspect ratio. In your video editor you can replicate this by either scaling SD video up to fit vertically in an HD timeline, or scale HD video down to fit vertically on an SD timeline. Once the scaling is done, the safe guides will be accurate, but they will not reflect the actual size of the different video formats when measured in pixels.

I hope that helps. 
One other thing to keep in mind... if you&#039;re actually working with digital SD video, the pixels in some SD video formats are not square. I don&#039;t remember the aspect ratio of the pixels, but you need to make sure that your software is compensating for this, and displaying the image correctly, otherwise everything will look slightly stretched. There used to be an option in photoshop to correct for non-square pixels... it&#039;s probably still there, but you probably need to compensate for this when making your image size comparison in photoshop. If not, your SD frame&#039;s aspect ratio won&#039;t be 4x3 (12x9) when pasted into an HD image which has square pixels.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://eks.tv/title-safe-still-matters/#comment-528">Sergio Pol</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Sergio, You are correct that SD is much smaller than HD video &#8211; about 1/6 the resolution. If I am understanding what you&#8217;re saying correctly, I think what you are seeing in photoshop is the difference in the number of pixels between SD and HD.<br />
The title safe areas are using the aspect ratio of the video formats, not the number of pixels. The HD (16&#215;9) aspect ratio is 33% wider than the SD (12&#215;9) aspect ratio.<br />
When HD video is played on an SD screen it isn&#8217;t a perfect pixel to pixel translation &#8211; the video is scaled down to vertically fit the SD screen, so only a small amount of information on the left and right are cropped from 16&#215;9 to 12&#215;9 aspect ratio. In your video editor you can replicate this by either scaling SD video up to fit vertically in an HD timeline, or scale HD video down to fit vertically on an SD timeline. Once the scaling is done, the safe guides will be accurate, but they will not reflect the actual size of the different video formats when measured in pixels.</p>
<p>I hope that helps.<br />
One other thing to keep in mind&#8230; if you&#8217;re actually working with digital SD video, the pixels in some SD video formats are not square. I don&#8217;t remember the aspect ratio of the pixels, but you need to make sure that your software is compensating for this, and displaying the image correctly, otherwise everything will look slightly stretched. There used to be an option in photoshop to correct for non-square pixels&#8230; it&#8217;s probably still there, but you probably need to compensate for this when making your image size comparison in photoshop. If not, your SD frame&#8217;s aspect ratio won&#8217;t be 4&#215;3 (12&#215;9) when pasted into an HD image which has square pixels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sergio Pol		</title>
		<link>https://eks.tv/title-safe-still-matters/#comment-528</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sergio Pol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2023 22:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://eks.tv/?p=2898#comment-528</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hello, I ran into your site looking for a safe frame image to import into photoshop. What motivated me to write is that I had to create a comparisson diagram between SD video and FHD video sizes, I created a rectangle with FHD dimensions overlapped by a rectangle with SD dimensions. No surprise there. The SD rectangle is much smaller than the FHD. But then I imported your safe frame guide into photoshop to start designing and that&#039;s when I got puzzled. The SD safe frame is just a little narrower than FHD, around 20% like you said. But in reality SD is way smaller than FHD. I went to the editing room and puzzled a fellow coworker with the same stuff. We did the experiment of inserting SD video on a FHD timeline and it looks way smaller, like the diagram I made. So why is it the 4:3 safe frames just a bit narrower on a FHD image on any video editing software? My logic tells me it has to do with something they do when broadcasting a FHD that will be received by an SD screen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, I ran into your site looking for a safe frame image to import into photoshop. What motivated me to write is that I had to create a comparisson diagram between SD video and FHD video sizes, I created a rectangle with FHD dimensions overlapped by a rectangle with SD dimensions. No surprise there. The SD rectangle is much smaller than the FHD. But then I imported your safe frame guide into photoshop to start designing and that&#8217;s when I got puzzled. The SD safe frame is just a little narrower than FHD, around 20% like you said. But in reality SD is way smaller than FHD. I went to the editing room and puzzled a fellow coworker with the same stuff. We did the experiment of inserting SD video on a FHD timeline and it looks way smaller, like the diagram I made. So why is it the 4:3 safe frames just a bit narrower on a FHD image on any video editing software? My logic tells me it has to do with something they do when broadcasting a FHD that will be received by an SD screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Erik Swanson		</title>
		<link>https://eks.tv/title-safe-still-matters/#comment-426</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erik Swanson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2022 16:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://eks.tv/?p=2898#comment-426</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://eks.tv/title-safe-still-matters/#comment-421&quot;&gt;tk&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for sharing. It&#039;s getting harder and harder to keep up with all the different device aspect ratios]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://eks.tv/title-safe-still-matters/#comment-421">tk</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing. It&#8217;s getting harder and harder to keep up with all the different device aspect ratios</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: tk		</title>
		<link>https://eks.tv/title-safe-still-matters/#comment-421</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 01:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://eks.tv/?p=2898#comment-421</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://eks.tv/title-safe-still-matters/#comment-405&quot;&gt;Erik Swanson&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for this article and especially the overlay image of all the ratios. To know exactly what safe area I need for an iPhone with a 19.5:1 ratio, I today tested an iPhone 12 by playing a YouTube clip shot natively in 19.5:1...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Go4a15GhK2k

...and found you cannot pinch to zoom to fill the screen with a native 19.5:1 video already taking up the screen. So I think it&#039;s safe for me to consider that 19.5:1 needs no horizontal safe area. BUT I&#039;ll be adding a vertical 90% safe area to the sides 1) to frame out that ugly iPhone notch, 2) to frame out the rounded iPhone corners, and 3) in case someone watches these clips on a TV that&#039;s zoomed in.

Of course, I could push it to 2.2:1 in case phone makers keep competing in this one area. Seasons 3 &#038; 4 of &quot;Ozark&quot; on Netflix was shot 2.2:1, so maybe they know the future.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://eks.tv/title-safe-still-matters/#comment-405">Erik Swanson</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for this article and especially the overlay image of all the ratios. To know exactly what safe area I need for an iPhone with a 19.5:1 ratio, I today tested an iPhone 12 by playing a YouTube clip shot natively in 19.5:1&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Go4a15GhK2k" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Go4a15GhK2k</a></p>
<p>&#8230;and found you cannot pinch to zoom to fill the screen with a native 19.5:1 video already taking up the screen. So I think it&#8217;s safe for me to consider that 19.5:1 needs no horizontal safe area. BUT I&#8217;ll be adding a vertical 90% safe area to the sides 1) to frame out that ugly iPhone notch, 2) to frame out the rounded iPhone corners, and 3) in case someone watches these clips on a TV that&#8217;s zoomed in.</p>
<p>Of course, I could push it to 2.2:1 in case phone makers keep competing in this one area. Seasons 3 &amp; 4 of &#8220;Ozark&#8221; on Netflix was shot 2.2:1, so maybe they know the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Erik Swanson		</title>
		<link>https://eks.tv/title-safe-still-matters/#comment-405</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erik Swanson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 22:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://eks.tv/?p=2898#comment-405</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://eks.tv/title-safe-still-matters/#comment-404&quot;&gt;Marion&lt;/a&gt;.

As long as the main portion of the small &quot;Picture in picture&quot; video is within title safe you should be fine with placing it in the corner. Just be mindful of where the final video will wind up. For example if it goes on youtube there could potentially be the channel watermark in the lower right portion of the screen, or the playback controls across the entire bottom if a viewer leaves their mouse cursor over it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://eks.tv/title-safe-still-matters/#comment-404">Marion</a>.</p>
<p>As long as the main portion of the small &#8220;Picture in picture&#8221; video is within title safe you should be fine with placing it in the corner. Just be mindful of where the final video will wind up. For example if it goes on youtube there could potentially be the channel watermark in the lower right portion of the screen, or the playback controls across the entire bottom if a viewer leaves their mouse cursor over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Marion		</title>
		<link>https://eks.tv/title-safe-still-matters/#comment-404</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 17:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://eks.tv/?p=2898#comment-404</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Any recommendations for corner placement of a Picture-in-picture? Tempting just to put it in the very corner of the frame for online video, but not sure that&#039;s best. Seems like the bottom should sit on the safe title line (for phone cropping/cutoff), but what about horizontally? All the way to outside edge of frame? Or left edge on 16:9 action safe? Thanks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any recommendations for corner placement of a Picture-in-picture? Tempting just to put it in the very corner of the frame for online video, but not sure that&#8217;s best. Seems like the bottom should sit on the safe title line (for phone cropping/cutoff), but what about horizontally? All the way to outside edge of frame? Or left edge on 16:9 action safe? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Erik Swanson		</title>
		<link>https://eks.tv/title-safe-still-matters/#comment-332</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erik Swanson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2021 12:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://eks.tv/?p=2898#comment-332</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://eks.tv/title-safe-still-matters/#comment-331&quot;&gt;Mendy&lt;/a&gt;.

I don&#039;t really have any experience with twitch. There are overlays that display during ads which let the viewer know that an ad will end soon, so if you are uploading an ad you should factor those in. I&#039;m not familiar enough with the other content on twitch, so I can&#039;t really give an informed opinion on it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://eks.tv/title-safe-still-matters/#comment-331">Mendy</a>.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really have any experience with twitch. There are overlays that display during ads which let the viewer know that an ad will end soon, so if you are uploading an ad you should factor those in. I&#8217;m not familiar enough with the other content on twitch, so I can&#8217;t really give an informed opinion on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mendy		</title>
		<link>https://eks.tv/title-safe-still-matters/#comment-331</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mendy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2021 04:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://eks.tv/?p=2898#comment-331</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been working with Twitch &#038; have yet to ever see the need for using title safe &#038; action safe zones. They appear to use chat and other twitch UI + not _actually_ filling the entire phone screen in order to ensure you get the entire published screen. Do you have any thoughts or experiences if streaming only to Twitch regarding safe zones?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been working with Twitch &amp; have yet to ever see the need for using title safe &amp; action safe zones. They appear to use chat and other twitch UI + not _actually_ filling the entire phone screen in order to ensure you get the entire published screen. Do you have any thoughts or experiences if streaming only to Twitch regarding safe zones?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Erik Swanson		</title>
		<link>https://eks.tv/title-safe-still-matters/#comment-15</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erik Swanson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2021 16:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://eks.tv/?p=2898#comment-15</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://eks.tv/title-safe-still-matters/#comment-13&quot;&gt;Jorelle&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks, I am glad you found value in the article. I am not able to find the original image to make a png of the title safe graphic.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://eks.tv/title-safe-still-matters/#comment-13">Jorelle</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks, I am glad you found value in the article. I am not able to find the original image to make a png of the title safe graphic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk

Served from: eks.tv @ 2026-11-13 16:29:23 by W3 Total Cache
-->